Icehouse Lightning Lab start-ups pitch to 300 investors

More wonderful ‘angel food’ being delivered by Lightning Lab. Congratulations to all those involved and best of luck to the companies for successful first rounds.

More than 300 investors are being offered the opportunity to invest in their choice of nine Auckland technology start-ups.

Auckland’s first Lightning Lab programme comes to a head at Spark’s headquarters on Thursday night as start-ups in a Dragon’s Den-style pitch their businesses to investors in the hope attracting funding.

The start-ups in the programme are Wearit, BrokerBetter.com, Justly, Roll, Designer Wardrobe, Logicore, Preno, Future Insight and Estimeet.

All up they were looking to raise a combined total of about $2 million, MacLeod- Smith said.

Lightning Lab gives selected start-ups $18,000 equity in exchange for an 8 per cent stake in the business.

The Lightening Lab is a digital accelerator programme run in partnership with incubation hub The Icehouse.

Founded by Wellington incubator Creative HQ, Lightning Lab mentors digital start-ups over 12 weeks, providing them with the skills and support to launch their businesses.

Auckland Lightning Lab programme organiser Mark MacLeod- Smith said each start-up was given eight minutes to stand up and sell their company, during which time investors were not able to ask questions.

After all the pitches had been presented the start-up owners networked with investors who then carry out due diligence over several weeks before deciding to invest in any of the companies, MacLeod- Smith said.

Read more on www.stuff.co.nz

 

Please follow and like us:

The idea: Ken Erskine of The Icehouse

The wind beneath the wings of New Zealand’s angel community, Ken Erskine talks about what makes a compelling, investable business.

You’ve seen lots of ideas for startup businesses come and go over the years. What factors have you observed make for a good business idea?

A good business idea can often be one that initially you’re not really sure if it’s a great idea or a really bad one – it’s usually one that is something in between. What I mean by that is if something’s a really great idea then the obvious question is ‘why hasn’t someone done that before?’.

The opposite scenario is also true – if it’s a really dumb idea, then there’s a good reason why no one has done it. So it’s that area in the middle where I generally see the best ideas coming from.

Often those ideas are also inspired by people’s insights gained from working in or around a particular industry or market. The mad inventor-style ideas – the random ones that just pop into someone’s head in the middle of the night – are generally the ones that are really hard to commercialise without that previous understanding of how the existing market behaves and operates.

When asking people to adopt any new idea you’re asking them to change their current behaviour, and getting them to do that comes down to how compelling a proposition you have to meet their unmet need or want.

The other thing about ideas is you have to understand the time and money it takes to get a new idea to market.

Therefore having an innate knowledge of what the latest trends and developments are in the marketplace, and trying to move ahead of the curve to where the market is going to be – not necessarily where the market is today – is really important.

What are the key factors for taking an idea and turning it into a viable business?

The key thing first of all is to validate the idea and establish if there is true a market need. One of the typical things that people who haven’t started a business before will say is ‘first I need to patent my idea’ and they can spend a fortune doing so.

My suggestion for non-research intensive ideas is, before you invest money on patenting your idea, first of all establish if there is a real market opportunity for it. You don’t need to say what your invention is – you can go out and ask open questions about the market or the need – but there’s no better time to establish if there’s a real opportunity than before you actually build or develop the thing.

Also, an idea on its own is never enough. Very rarely does anyone have a unique idea that no one has had before, so part of the challenge is doing something with it in an appropriate manner. As an entrepreneur it’s really about keeping that balance between dogged determination and resilience, and knowing when to say ‘I’m not getting enough traction, let’s move on to the next idea’.

What I really like to see is a business that’s trying to move towards break-even or commerciality as quickly as it can. You may be commercially sustainable on day one, but it’s important to always have a keen eye on how you get to a point of being cashflow positive. Because without customers and money what you can have is a really expensive hobby. And there’s nothing wrong with having a hobby as long as you realise that’s what it is.

Some entrepreneurs have really interesting back stories to their ideas. What role do you think having a great ‘story’ behind an idea makes?

Every startup needs to have its own story and that story has to resonate. So I think it’s fundamentally important as a way to communicate between the founder and potential partners or customers. People love stories, but a key thing to understand is you have one mouth and two ears; you want to use your story to engage in a dialogue, so you can bring others along on the journey.

What’s a key piece of advice you’d have for anyone looking to turn their idea into a real business?

While the idea is key and a catalyst to get you started, it’s what you do with the idea that makes the difference. Thousands of people have a millions of ideas every day; it’s what you do with that idea and how you bring it to life that’s most important. In business, that involves relating your idea to potential customers and markets and allowing others to join in your idea and share it and help you develop it to meet their needs.

Coming up in Your Business: Etsy is a massive global marketplace to buy and sell all things homemade. So what are some of the great Kiwi businesses making a living out of selling on this platform? If you’ve got a story to tell on growing a small business through Etsy, drop me a note: nzhsmallbusiness@gmail.com

As published NZ Herald 6 May 2015

Please follow and like us:

Andy Hamilton: Kiwi companies need to think bigger

In this article Ice House CEO and former AANZ Chair, Andy Hamilton challenges us all to think bigger and be more focused in our aspirations for economic growth and specifically the ventures angels are supporting.

Everything is fine in New Zealand is it not? The country has experienced a great few years. We have ridden the commodity boom and other countries’ misfortunes.

Things have changed for the better, while many things have not. What could be wrong?

My view is the current Government has a definitive optimistic plan for our economy and it should be complimented for its focus, clarity and execution.

At the same time, I wonder whether it has an indefinite optimistic approach to the hidden challenge that exists, and that is dangerous for our long-term prospects.

To me, the Government lacks a plan to enable our economy to be truly competitive longer-term.

Just riding out the macro factors will not be enough to win.

We have always, it seems, produced great people and some teams which are world beaters, but we have not and are not creating great companies on a global scale fast enough.

A key metric: How many companies in New Zealand employ more than 100 people? The answer is 2318, with an average employee number of 430, representing 48 per cent of all employed persons in our country. Do you think this is a small or big number?

Actually, the relative result is very similar to comparable countries, but the hidden metric, the big and scary difference, is the quantum size of our big companies vis-a-vis these other countries.

Our big are way, way smaller.

This has implications for our long-term prospects and I believe this needs to change for us to improve the nature of our economy and ultimately GDP per capita for our people.
We lack a supply of entrepreneurs who can turn ideas into global companies like the Israelis or Americans or a supply of talented executives in fast-growing industries such as technology that can do the coding, do the tech work.
Without this wealth we will not be able to look after our people and the increased stratification that is occurring between the rich and poor all over the world will also be in NZ. That leads to discontent and worse.

We know we produce good talent, whether that is as sportspeople or executives in large organisations. We know we can make stuff, like milk and more recently technology.

But can we build big companies that ultimately benefit and help us create a better future for New Zealand? Big question.

Our Government knows this is the problem. Even though it may be harsh to say its position is as an indefinite optimist, I contend that it lacks a plan and the confidence to attack this issue, and maybe even it has not prioritised this as far up the job list as it should.

One company the size of Fonterra is not going to cut it, it is like what we call “key person risk”.

My solution: Only one thing matters and that is talent, but talent specifically in building big and bigger companies.

Let’s take the pulse for that.

We have a great bunch of expats and Kiwiphiles, and arguably an over-supply in the demand for their skills, experience and networks.

We are seeing emerging technology and new age leaders, aspirational millennials who don’t want to work for the “person”. An emerging group of early stage investors, angels and venture capitalists who are learning fast how to support and enable our companies to succeed. And an emerging global group of believers, Peter Thiel of Founders Fund and Vinod Khosla of Khosla Ventures to name just two.

On the other hand, we don’t have senior executives in our big companies who are built to succeed in the world, nor board members of our big companies with diverse perspectives and experience from key markets such as Asia and America.

We lack a supply of entrepreneurs who can turn ideas into global companies like the Israelis or Americans or a supply of talented executives in fast-growing industries such as technology that can do the coding, do the tech work. And finally, we lack a set of investment bankers who can help build global capital pools to support our companies’ global aspirations.

There is much work to do, and the only thing to do when faced with a big challenge is to start biting it off one chunk at a time.

We must do something, we must engage. If you live overseas then nominate yourself to go on the boards of Kiwi companies to give them an outside-in perspective. Do like Bridget Coates, Derek Handley, Phil Veal and Claudia Batten and find a way on to the boards.
The director pool in New Zealand is a blue-rinse club, both men and women, and it was very challenging for these people to break through, but they did, and so should you because it does and will make a difference.
The director pool in New Zealand is a blue-rinse club, both men and women, and it was very challenging for these people to break through, but they did, and so should you because it does and will make a difference.

If you are from the tech industry, and you know how to hire and train more people to get into the tech industry, we need you in New Zealand, because our fast-growing tech companies are sucking up all the available talent and not investing enough to fill the gap of what is likely 10,000 jobs right now.

Maybe instead of going from 500 to 700 focus firms for the Government’s NZTE, they should have gone to 300 firms and really enabled their scaling, or were they worried about the value they create for these firms?

Now, despite the challenges and hurdles, there are some signs that are good. There is a shift happening in NZ, it is just that you need to look for it.

Look at the number of listings over the past few years alongside the performance of the NZX itself, which has ranged from 15-28 per cent year on year for the past three.

There have been exits too, Greenbutton’s sale to Microsoft generated a significant return for the founders and investors, Sutton Group and Gardians were sold to Danone showing it is not just tech where value can be created.

There is also an emerging pack that includes Lanaztech, Rocket Lab, PowerbyProxi, Nexus6, Vend and Shuttle Rock and others regularly coming out like STQRY, Puteko, Parrot Analytics, Drikolor, 1-Above, Harmoney, Varigate, Texus Fibre and iMeasureu.

All of this activity is healthy, it fuels and stokes the pipe, but we need to remember that we must see scale being achieved from this. How many companies sit alongside Fonterra and are actually delivering year-on-year sustainable returns? Wouldn’t it be great to have the top 10, top 50 globally relevant and scaled businesses owned out of New Zealand?

Things are good in New Zealand, but we should not be fooled. In my view we must address our lack of ability to build scaled and relevant global corporations from New Zealand and we must get on to it now.

I encourage others to positively address this challenge by finding ways to make a difference to create globally scaled and relevant firms from New Zealand.

Andy Hamilton is chief executive of business incubator The Icehouse.

First published in NZ Herald 12 March 2015

Please follow and like us:

Icehouse targets startups in more focused programme

Tags: Icehouse, Startup

The Auckland-based global business incubator will focus each year on a maximum of 25 small to medium sized enterprises, down from an annual average of 75.

“In the context of what we are trying to achieve, which is ultimately to create more jobs and create more wealth, it is an expansion. It is not really a contraction,” Icehouse chief executive Andrew Hamilton told BusinessDesk. “What we’re trying to do is dial up the startups that have great international potential that we can support with great expertise, networks and funding.”

Tech-based start-ups which can be developed and brought to market quickly will be the main focus for incubator programme, and there will be no requirement for the businesses supported to remain based in New Zealand, although part of Icehouse’s new focus is to create 25,000 New Zealand jobs by 2020.

Read more from Scoop.co.nz

Please follow and like us:

Lead Partners

NZTE NZVIF PWC

Expert Partner

NZX AVID AJ Park “FNZC.jpg”

AANZ Summit Sponsors

Callaghan Innovation “UniServices” Kiwinet “Spark”